Abstract
A significant risk factor for ischemic stroke is carotid atherosclerotic plaque that is susceptible to rupture, with rupture potential conveyed by plaque morphology. Human carotid plaque composition and structure have been delineated noninvasively and in vivo by evaluating log(VoA), a parameter derived as the decadic log of the second time derivative of displacement induced by an acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI). In prior work, ARFI-induced displacement was measured using conventional focused tracking; however, this requires a long data acquisition period, thereby reducing framerate. We herein evaluate if ARFI log(VoA) framerate can be increased without a reduction in plaque imaging performance using plane wave tracking instead. In silico, both focused- and plane wave-tracked log(VoA) decreased with increasing echobrightness, quantified as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but did not vary with material elasticity for SNRs below 40 dB. For SNRs of 40-60 dB, both focused- and plane wave-tracked log(VoA) varied with SNR and material elasticity. Above 60 dB SNR, both focused- and plane wave-tracked log(VoA) varied with material elasticity alone. This suggests that log(VoA) discriminates features according to a combination of their echobrightness and mechanical property. Further, while both focused- and plane-wave tracked log(VoA) values were artifactually inflated by mechanical reflections at inclusion boundaries, plane wave-tracked log(VoA) was more strongly impacted by off-axis scattering. Applied to three excised human cadaveric carotid plaques with spatially aligned histological validation, both log(VoA) methods detected regions of lipid, collagen, and calcium (CAL) deposits. These findings support that plane wave tracking performs comparably to focused tracking for log(VoA) imaging and that plane wave-tracked log(VoA) is a viable approach to discriminating clinically relevant atherosclerotic plaque features at a 30-fold higher framerate than by focused tracking.