Evaluating Bias and Racism in a Risk-Factor-Based Drug Testing Policy in the Labor and Delivery Department

评估产科基于风险因素的药物检测政策中的偏见和种族主义

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess bias in and consent before drug testing during prenatal care and birth in a hospital system with a risk-factor-based drug testing policy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who delivered in a regional hospital system from January 1, 2020, to June 1, 2022. Chart abstraction identified whether urine drug testing was performed and age, race, marital status, insurance status, ZIP code, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), and delivery mode. Propensity score matching through a pregnancy risk model was used to assess the association of race, insurance status, marital status, and median income with likelihood of testing. Data were analyzed with logistic regression. Charts of 200 randomly selected patients were also evaluated for documentation of consent, testing indication, test result, and child welfare reports. RESULTS: Among 20,084 patients, 1,251 (6.2%) were tested, of whom 142 (11.3%) tested positive. White patients had a higher rate of positive test results (16.6%) compared with patients of other racial groups (overall rate 11.3%). None of the patients had consent documented. The most common indication for testing was limited prenatal care (48.7%). Fewer than a third of tests (28.5%) were obtained for a medical indication. The majority (67.9%) of positive results were reported to child welfare services. CONCLUSION: Risk-factor-based toxicology policies disproportionately target Black, low-income, single, publicly insured, and uninsured patients. Patients are typically not consented; testing is infrequently obtained for medical indications; and reports to child welfare services based on positive test results are common.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。