The cost-effectiveness of using vilobelimab with immunomodulators to treat severely ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: A subgroup analysis of the PANAMO study

使用维洛贝利单抗联合免疫调节剂治疗重症机械通气COVID-19患者的成本效益:PANAMO研究的亚组分析

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anti-C5a complement factor blocker vilobelimab (Gohibic) is authorized for emergency use by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 when initiated within 48 hours of starting invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In the PANAMO phase 3 trial of vilobelimab vs standard of care (SoC) (corticosteroids and antithrombotic agents), a post hoc analysis showed that prior and/or concomitant treatment with immunomodulators (tocilizumab or baricitinib) provided additional survival benefit with vilobelimab (n = 34) but not with SoC (n = 37). The point estimate for 28-day all-cause mortality for these groups was 6.3% vs 40.9% (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.56; P = 0.006). The current analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of vilobelimab vs SoC for the subgroup in the PANAMO study receiving immunomodulators. METHODS: A short-term acute care decision tree followed by a postdischarge 2-state Markov cohort model was used to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the treatment arms. The model simulated progression from severe COVID-19 to survival or death over a lifetime. Outcomes data (COVID-19 all-cause mortality) were incorporated from PANAMO. Posthospitalization mortality was based on CDC age-specific survival data. Utility values and hospital costs came from the literature, and the cost of vilobelimab was obtained from Red Book online. RESULTS: The total cost of care was $103,414 with SoC and $132,247 with vilobelimab, with an incremental cost of $28,833. SoC provided 6.05 QALYs vs 9.71 QALYs for vilobelimab (3.65 additional QALYs). The ICER for vilobelimab compared to SoC, both with immunomodulators, was $7,892/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the cost-effectiveness result, as vilobelimab + SoC was favored at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in over 98% of iterations. CONCLUSION: Vilobelimab therapy provides a cost-effective option to treat severely ill, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 with prior and/or concomitant treatment with immunomodulators at a value well below the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。