Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using the local divergence exponent (LDE), it has been concluded that walking stability is impaired in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, the use of several calculation approaches hinders comparisons across studies. We aimed to determine whether using different parameters for state space reconstruction to calculate LDE affects the classification of pwMS. METHODS: A total of 55 pwMS and 23 controls walked up and down a 20 m corridor for 5 min. The LDE was calculated using three different combinations of n-dimensions (d(E)) and time delays (τ): (a) trial-specific, (b) median across subjects, and (c) fixed d(E) = 5 and τ = 10. The LDE was calculated using vertical (VT), mediolateral (ML), and anteroposterior (AP) accelerations, the norm (N), and 3D data from sensors placed on the sternum and lumbar. Classification accuracy across results obtained with different parameter combinations was compared using a Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA). RESULTS: The best classification accuracy, 84%, was achieved when using the LDE obtained with norm acceleration data from the sternum sensor with a fixed d(E) = 5 and τ = 10 and considering speed as a covariate. Lumbar LDEs were less accurate than sternum LDEs. CONCLUSIONS: LDEs calculated with a fixed d(E) = 5 and τ = 10 for the norm acceleration from a sternum-placed sensor can best classify pwMS. Using fixed parameters for the state space reconstruction, and consequently LDE calculation, can simplify the implementation of the LDE as a mobility biomarker in MS and provides evidence for future consensus for its calculation.