Abstract
Background: Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) is a chronic vestibular disorder that has been receiving more research attention lately. Nonetheless, there is a lack of systematic bibliometric overviews tracing the conceptual evolution, knowledge structure, and emerging research frontiers within this field. The utilization of bibliometric and visualization analyses can enhance the understanding of trends and central themes in PPPD research, offering valuable insights for future studies. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, yielding a final dataset of 370 bibliographic records ("DATA"). We employed CiteSpace, HistCite, the Alluvial Generator, and R software to conduct multi-dimensional statistical and visualization analyses on publication trends, collaborative networks (countries/institutions/authors), disciplinary distribution, citation bursts, and the evolution of keyword clusters. Results: Starting from 2005, there has been a notable increase in publication volume, reaching its peak in 2024. The United States and Germany are at the forefront of national collaboration, with the University of Munich and the Mayo Clinic being key research institutions. The research focus has transitioned from a primary emphasis on Psychiatry to a broader scope encompassing Neurosciences, Otorhinolaryngology, and General Medicine. Keyword analysis reveals a shift towards standardized terminology, transitioning from "phobic postural vertigo" to "diagnostic criteria" and "consensus documents". Current research trends are centered around comorbidity mechanisms like "vestibular migraine", therapeutic approaches such as "vestibular rehabilitation", and quality of life assessments using the "dizziness handicap inventory". The 2017 consensus document by the Bárány Society is highlighted as a pivotal publication with significant citation impact. Conclusions: The intellectual structure of the field, as revealed by this bibliometric analysis, has transitioned from a phenomenological description to a conceptual unification. The bibliometric analysis indicates that the field is currently in a conceptually stabilized stage characterized by a research focus on refining diagnostic precision and comorbidity exploration, while scholarly attention remains biologically exploratory regarding objective biomarkers and pathophysiological mechanisms.