Abstract
Miniscrews are used in orthodontic treatment and can be applied immediately after implantation, making their initial stability crucial. However, clinical reports show that the success rate is not 100%, and many researchers have tried to identify the factors influencing success and optimize designs. A review of the literature reveals that studies on the same geometric parameter of miniscrews using different indicators and different brand samples have led to conflicting results. This study will use consistent miniscrew conditions to verify whether the design differences in the literature are reasonable. This study employs the Taguchi method and ANOVA for optimization analysis. The four control factors comprise thread pitch, thread depth, tip taper angle, and self-tapping notch. Using an L9(3(4)) orthogonal array, the experimental models are reduced to nine. The primary stability indicators for the miniscrew include bending strength, pull-out strength, insertion torque, and self-tapping performance. The results of the single-objective experiments in this study align with the findings from the other literature. However, when analyzed collectively, they do not yield the same optimal solution. Under equal weighting, the combined multi-objective optimal solution is A2B2C1D1. This study exhibits minimal experimental error, ensuring high analytical reliability. The findings confirm that the optimal design does not converge across four single-objective analyses, as different stability indicators yield contradictory trends in design parameters. Given that these four indicators already demonstrate notable discrepancies, the influence of additional stability factors would be even more pronounced. Therefore, a multi-objective optimization approach is essential for the rational design of miniscrews.