Comparative Safety and Volume Trends in Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Percutaneous Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Radiologic Approaches at a Single Center

单中心经皮内镜与经皮放射介入胃造瘘管置入术安全性和数量趋势比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) are established techniques for long-term enteral access. Contemporary comparisons of complication patterns, length of stay (LOS), and utilization trends remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing initial gastrostomy placement at a single academic center between 2021 and 2024 (n = 341). The primary outcome was any 30-day procedure-related complication. Secondary outcomes included complication subtypes, LOS, and procedural volume trends. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Among 341 patients, 195 underwent PEG and 146 PRG. Overall complication rates were similar (PEG 16.4% vs. PRG 14.4%, p = 0.31). Infectious complications were numerically higher with PEG (4.1% vs. 1.4%), though not statistically significant. Mean LOS was 3.2 days for PEG and 2.8 days for PRG (p = 0.12). On multivariable analysis, gastrostomy technique was not associated with complications (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.48–1.61) or LOS. PRG utilization increased substantially over the study period, comprising 60.7% of procedures by 2024. Conclusions: PEG and PRG demonstrated no statistically significant differences in safety outcomes, with no statistically significant differences in complications or LOS. A marked shift toward PRG utilization was observed over time. These findings support individualized, patient-centered selection of gastrostomy technique, while acknowledging limited power to detect small but clinically meaningful differences.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。