Abstract
This study assessed the effects of passive arm-support exoskeletons (ASEs) on postural stability during repetitive arm-reaching tasks. In a 3 × 3 × 2 within-subject design, twenty-four healthy right-handed men completed left-, front-, and right-facing arm-reaching tasks at two working distances (65.5 and 68.9 cm) under three intervention conditions (Without, VEX, Airframe). Postural stability was assessed using center of pressure (CoP) data recorded from a force plate. Both ASEs clearly reduced the mean amplitude of CoP in the mediolateral (ML) direction (i.e., the absolute value of MEAN ML and ML APDF10), although neither yielded improvements in anteroposterior (AP) stability. Task direction significantly influenced all CoP measures: left-facing tasks produced the greatest leftward bias, whereas front-facing tasks yielded the smallest AP CoP amplitude. Increasing the working distance by <4 cm modestly heightened AP bias, as reflected in larger AP bias metrics (i.e., MEAN AP, ML APDF50, and ML APDF90). Overall, passive ASEs selectively enhanced lateral postural control, while their effect on AP stability was negligible or even slightly adverse. These findings indicate that the practical utility of passive ASEs depends on the directional demands of specific occupational tasks.