Effect of Prolonged Ovarian Stimulation (24 and 48 Hours) Compared to Conventional Duration on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial : Effect of Prolonged Ovarian Stimulation on IVF/ICSI

延长卵巢刺激(24 小时和 48 小时)与常规刺激时间对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)结局的影响:一项单盲随机临床试验:延长卵巢刺激对体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Background: Infertility is a global public health concern, and controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) plays a crucial role in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) by facilitating the retrieval of multiple oocytes. This single-blind randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate whether extending the duration of COS by 24 and 48 hours beyond the conventional protocol would affect pregnancy rates in couples undergoing IVF/ICSI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: Ninety patients were randomized into three groups: control (GC), 24-hours longer (G24), and 48-hours longer (G48), using block randomization. The GC group followed the standard COS protocol, while G24 and G48 received extended COS for their respective durations. Primary outcomes included imaging-proven pregnancy at six weeks gestation, chemical pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy post-embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included follicle, oocyte, and embryo counts. RESULTS: Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were positively correlated with pregnancy outcomes. Significant associations were observed between AFC/AMH and follicle/oocyte/embryo counts. Although embryo counts varied among groups, no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were found. A trend towards improved outcomes was noted from GC to G48, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: The study did not find significant differences in pregnancy rates or other outcomes with prolonged COS durations compared to conventional protocols. However, the results suggest a need for further research to explore the effects of extended COS in specific patient subsets, as existing literature indicates potential benefits.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。