Comparative Analysis of YOLO Series Algorithms for UAV-Based Highway Distress Inspection: Performance and Application Insights

基于无人机的公路病害检测YOLO系列算法对比分析:性能与应用启示

阅读:1

Abstract

Established unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) highway distress detection (HDD) faces the dual challenges of accuracy and efficiency, this paper conducted a comparative study on the application of the YOLO (You Only Look Once) series of algorithms in UAV-based HDD to provide a reference for the selection of models. YOLOv5-l and v9-c achieved the highest detection accuracy, with YOLOv5-l performing well in mean and classification detection precision and recall, while YOLOv9-c showed poor performance in these aspects. In terms of detection efficiency, YOLOv10-n, v7-t, and v11-n achieved the highest levels, while YOLOv5-n, v8-n, and v10-n had the smallest model sizes. Notably, YOLOv11-n was the best-performing model in terms of combined detection efficiency, model size, and computational complexity, making it a promising candidate for embedded real-time HDD. YOLOv5-s and v11-s were found to balance detection accuracy and model lightweightness, although their efficiency was only average. When comparing t/n and l/c versions, the changes in the backbone network of YOLOv9 had the greatest impact on detection accuracy, followed by the network depth_multiple and width_multiple of YOLOv5. The relative compression degrees of YOLOv5-n and YOLOv8-n were the highest, and v9-t achieved the greatest efficiency improvement in UAV HDD, followed by YOLOv10-n and v11-n.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。