Comparative real-world retention rate and safety of biosimilar IBI303 versus Humira in ankylosing spondylitis: A retrospective study

生物类似药IBI303与阿达木单抗(Humira)在强直性脊柱炎患者中的真实世界药物保留率和安全性比较:一项回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Biosimilars play an important role in reducing the economic burden on patients, but the effectiveness of biosimilars in real-world is also being challenged. This study aims to evaluate Humira and IBI303 for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by retention rate and safety through real-world data. We extracted patient information from the hospital information system of Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital, the time range is from May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, and conducted a retrospective study. The primary study outcome was the adalimumab retention rate at week 52 and it was estimated through survival analysis. We analyzed the data of 106 patients with AS. Among them, the retention rates of 38 patients using Humira at 12 weeks and 52 weeks were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.92) and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.34-0.52), and in the IBI303 group were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.68-0.93) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69), respectively. Drug exposure every 4 weeks of first 52 weeks were 55.0 (44.2-66.7) and 55.6 (43.3-69.6) in Humira and IBI303 group, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was no statistically significant difference between the Humira and IBI303 groups (P > .05). However, the Humira group had significantly higher median costs in the first year than the IBI303 group (P = .004). In conclusion, in Chinese AS patients, there is no difference in retention rate and safety between generic and brand-name adalimumab in real-world use, but IBI303 is the more cost-effective choice.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。