Chemo-Sensory Markers for Red Wine Grades: A Correlation Study of Phenolic Profiles and Sensory Attributes

红葡萄酒等级的化学感官标志物:酚类成分与感官属性的相关性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

To reveal the characteristic physicochemical indicators of wines of different quality grades and explore their feasibility as auxiliary indicators for grading, 23 wines from the Manas subregion of Xinjiang were used as test materials. Sensory evaluation, colour difference analysis, and electronic tongue technology were employed, combined with nontargeted metabolomics and quantitative analysis, to analyze differences in phenolic compounds, colour parameters, and taste characteristics among wines of different grades. Finally, a quality evaluation model for Cabernet Sauvignon wine was constructed using partial least squares regression (PLSR). The results revealed significant differences in the L* values, a* values, and C*ab values among wines of different grades. Grade A wines presented lower L* values, higher a* values, and higher C*ab values, indicating lower brightness, deeper red tones, and higher saturation. Taste characteristic differences were primarily manifested in Grade A wines, which have higher acidity, astringency, bitterness, and richness but exhibit lower bitterness aftertaste and astringency aftertaste. The results of the quantitative analysis and correlation analysis indicate that the differences in sensory characteristics among different grades of wine stem from variations in their polyphenolic compound contents. The higher anthocyanin content in Grade A wine is associated with higher a* values; higher flavonoid content is closely related to higher astringency and bitterness values; and lower flavanol content is associated with lower bitterness aftertaste and astringency aftertaste values. The PLSR model results indicate that when sensory characteristic parameters and phenolic compound content are used as predictor variables (X) and grade is used as the response variable (Y), the PLSR model has a calibration set R(2) = 0.97 and a validation set R(2) = 0.92, the calibration set RMSE is 0.13, and the validation set RMSE is 0.25. The model demonstrates good fitting performance, establishing an objective method for evaluating wine quality that avoids evaluation errors caused by the subjective factors of winemakers and tasters. This study is the first to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the sensory characteristic and chemical components of three grades of wine, providing data support and theoretical references for the improvement of wine quality evaluation systems.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。