Abstract
AIM: To compare the lifetime and annual economic burden of spectacles, contact lenses, and refractive surgery in correction of refractive errors. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with convenience sampling which 120 patients were interviewed in a tertiary referral hospital in the Iranian health care system. The bottom-up based cost of illness approach was estimated using a face-to-face interview to assess the direct and indirect cost of different refractive errors correction of any correction technologies. RESULTS: Correction with spectacle imposes a total direct cost of US dollar (US$) 342.5 (±8.41) per year and US$9373.5 (±230.1) per lifetime to each patient. These figures for the contact lenses were obtained US$198.3 (±0.12) and US$5203.1 (±256.3) and for refractive surgery were obtained US$19.1 (±1.2) and US$568.1 (±64.6), respectively. Overall, based on age-adjusted prevalence rates, astigmatism had the highest share of refractive errors economic burden with a lifetime direct cost of slightly less than US$5.49 billion, while hyperopia and myopia imposed less than US$5.24 and 4.2 billion on patients, respectively. The annually imposed cost on each individual Iranian patient with refractive errors is US$308.5. CONCLUSION: Based on 18mo post refractive surgery course observation, which is generalized to whole life, refractive surgery significantly imposed much less cost compared with spectacles and contact lenses. Refractive errors among Iranians result in considerable economic burden. Using the refractive surgery instead of other two correction methods has the ability to reduce this economic loss in the future.