Comparison of dry and wet deposition of particulate matter in near-surface waters during summer

夏季近地表水体中颗粒物干沉降和湿沉降的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) deposition which involves both dry and wet processes is an important means of controlling air pollution. To investigate the characteristics of dry and wet deposition in wetlands, PM concentrations and meteorological conditions were monitored during summer at heights of 1.5 m, 6 m and 10 m above ground level at Cuihu Wetland (Beijing, China) in order to assess the efficiency of PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <2.5 μm) and PM10 (particles with an aerodynamic size of <10 μm) removal. The results showed: Daily concentrations of PM, dry deposition velocities and fluxes changed with the same variation trend. The daily average deposition velocity for PM10 (3.19 ± 1.18 cm·s-1) was almost 10 times that of PM2.5 (0.32 ± 0.33 cm·s-1). For PM2.5, the following dry deposition fluxes were recorded: 10 m (0.170 ± 0.463 μg·m-2·s-1) > 6 m (0.007 ± 0.003 μg·m-2·s-1) > 1.5 m (0.005 ± 0.002 μg·m-2·s-1). And the following deposition fluxes for PM10 were recorded: 10 m (2.163 ± 2.941 μg·m-2·s-1) > 1.5 m (1.565 ± 0.872 μg·m-2·s-1) > 6 m (0.987 ± 0.595 μg·m-2·s-1). In the case of wet deposition, the relative deposition fluxes for PM2.5 and PM10 were 1.5 m > 10 m > 6 m, i.e. there was very little difference between the fluxes for PM2.5 (0.688 ± 0.069 μg·m-2·s-1) and for PM10 (0.904 ± 0.103 μg·m-2·s-1). It was also noted that rainfall intensity and PM diameter influenced wet deposition efficiency. Dry deposition (63%) was more tilted towards removing PM10 than was the case for wet deposition (37%). In terms of PM2.5 removal, wet deposition (92%) was found to be more efficient.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。