Adequacy, safety, and technical determinants of a modified EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling technique in patients with or without cirrhosis: a pilot study

改良型超声内镜引导下肝活检取样技术在伴或不伴肝硬化患者中的适用性、安全性及技术决定因素:一项初步研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Technique-related factors of EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling (EUS-LB) as a determinant of specimen yield have not been studied. We used a modified technique to study adequacy, safety, and technical determinants in patients with or without cirrhosis. METHODS: EUS-LB was performed with a 19-gauge Franseen-tip needle by wet heparinized suction. One or 2 passes with a variable number of actuations were taken, with an endpoint of the aspiration of blood. Primary outcomes were tissue core adequacy and definitive histologic diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were a correlation between the number and depth of actuations with total specimen length (TSL), longest specimen length (LSL), and adverse events (AEs). Early and late AEs were also accessed. RESULTS: Adequate samples were seen in 48 of 50 patients, and a histologic diagnosis could be achieved in 49 of 50 patients. Mean TSL, LSL, and depth of actuation were 7.98 ± 3.74 cm, 1.89 ± .80 cm, and 4.29 ± .98 cm, respectively. The median number of complete portal tracts was 23 (range, 7-50) and number of actuations was 7 (range, 4-12). The correlation between TSL with number and depth of actuation was r = .71 versus r = .53 and r = .55 versus r = .51 and for LSL was r = .28 versus r = .11 and r = .74 versus r = .55 in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, respectively. No major and 7 (14%) minor AEs were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This modified EUS-LB technique resulted in adequate tissue acquisition and is safe in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients. Technical factors like the number and depth of actuations determine specimen yield.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。