Abstract
Following the success of the first hyperspectral sensor, the evaluation of hyperspectral image capability became a challenge in research, which mainly focused on improving image pre-processing and processing steps to minimize their errors, whereas in this study, the focus was on the weight of hyperspectral sensor characteristics on image capability in order to distinguish this effect from errors caused by image pre-processing and processing steps and improve our knowledge of errors. For these purposes, two satellite hyperspectral sensors with similar spatial and spectral characteristics (Hyperion and PRISMA) were compared with corresponding synthetic images, and the city of Venice was selected as the study area. After creating the synthetic images, the errors in the simulation of Hyperion and PRISMA images were evaluated (1.6 and 1.1%, respectively). The same spectral unmixing procedure was performed using real and synthetic images, and their accuracies were compared. The spectral accuracies in root mean square error were equal to 0.017 and 0.016, respectively. In addition, 72.3 and 77.4% of these values were related to sensor characteristics. The spatial accuracies in the mean absolute error were equal to 3.93 and 3.68, respectively. A total of 55.6 and 59.0% of these values were related to sensor characteristics, and 22.6 and 22.3% were related to co-localization and spatial resampling errors. The difference between the radiometric precision values of the sensors was 6.81 and 5.91% regarding the spectral and spatial accuracies of Hyperion image. In conclusion, the results of this study showed that the combined use of two or more real hyperspectral images with similar characteristics and their synthetic images quantifies the weight of hyperspectral sensor characteristics on their image capability and improves our knowledge regarding processing errors, and thus image capability.