Abstract
Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are one of the standard treatments for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Some patients may opt for Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) of their own free will. However, there is no real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of CHM. We aimed to explore the effectiveness of CHM for DKD in comparison to ARBs. We enrolled 732 DKD patients (72 used only CHM and 661 used ARBs) from 2007 to 2016, and all patients were followed until December 2016 at China Medical University Hospital in Taiwan. A total of 355 ARB users and 71 CHM users were analyzed after propensity score matching. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after treatment was 84.9 ± 28.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in CHM users, which was higher than that (67.8 ± 35.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) in ARB users (p < 0.001). The change in the eGFR was -6.0 ± 21.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in CHM users and -12.9 ± 24.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in ARB users (p = 0.029). The blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels of patients taking CHM were 22 ± 16 mg/dl and 0.9 ± 0.4 mg/dl, respectively, and were lower than those (30 ± 28 mg/dl and 1.7 ± 2.0 mg/dl) of patients taking ARBs (p = 0.025 and p = 0.003). Using linear regression with adjustments for age, sex, BMI, baseline eGFR, and HbA1c levels, we found that the declines in the eGFR/baseline eGFR and changes in the urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.86 and 0.73). This study suggests that CHM may have comparable effectiveness to ARBs, which provides insights for further investigations.