Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are usually monitored with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or activated clotting time (ACT). Both are complex assays with multiple enzymatic steps, and performance may be influenced by physiologic and pathologic factors unrelated to the DTI. Simpler systems, such as clot-based dilute thrombin time (dTT) and chromogenic anti-factor IIa assays, have been developed for monitoring DTIs, but there is limited data on their performance in clinical settings. METHODS: Medical records of patients who received bivalirudin between March 2020 and April 2022 at a single institution were reviewed for demographic data and adverse outcomes. Plasma samples drawn for aPTT testing were analyzed with chromogenic anti-IIa and dTT bivalirudin assays. Results were compared to bivalirudin dosing. RESULTS: Results of aPTT assays from 32 patients were compared with the chromogenic (n = 136) and dTT (n = 120) bivalirudin assays. Correlations between the aPTT and the chromogenic and dTT assays were poor (Spearman coefficients 0.55 and 0.62, respectively). There was a stronger correlation when results of the chromogenic and dTT assays were compared to each other (Spearman coefficient 0.92). When assay results were compared to bivalirudin dose, there were stronger correlations with the chromogenic and dTT assays than with the aPTT (Spearman coefficients 0.51, 0.63 and 0.22, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variation between results of specific bivalirudin assays and the aPTT. While bivalirudin assay results correlated better with administered drug dose, suggesting improving reliability, more studies are needed to determine if there is correlation between testing and clinical outcomes.