Abstract
Background Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are commonly treated with percutaneous K-wire or plate fixation. The relative efficacy and stability of these methods, particularly in osteoporotic patients and in cases involving both distal radius and ulna fractures, remain subjects of clinical debate. Objective This study aims to compare the outcomes of percutaneous K-wire fixation versus plate fixation in patients with distal end radius fractures, focusing on postoperative stability in osteoporotic conditions and both-bone distal end fractures. Methods A total of 50 patients were retrospectively analysed and divided into two groups: 25 underwent percutaneous K-wire fixation, and 25 underwent plate fixation. Outcomes measured included bone healing time, complication rates, functional recovery using the DASH score, and radiological outcomes through standard X-ray imaging. Results Preliminary data suggest that plate fixation offers better stability, especially in osteoporotic patients and cases with both-bone involvement. Complications with K-wire fixation were more frequent in these subgroups. Conclusion Plate fixation may provide superior stability and functional outcomes in treating DRFs, particularly in complex cases involving osteoporosis or bone injuries. Further research with larger sample sizes and prospective design is recommended.