Abstract
Experiential quality assessment(EQA) is an important sensory analysis for judging herbal quality grades. Because of the high empirical utility of expert experience, the consistency, science and inheritance of such experience are continuously in dispute. To explore the scientific evidence for this subjective method, we designed a Delphi expert investigation coupled with chemical analysis to evaluate the quality of Schisandrae Chinensis Fructus (SCF). Initially, 13 experts were invited to independently evaluate the grades of 11 batches of SCF. After screening the consistency and repeatability of the evaluation results, typical samples of all quality levels were identified. Seven significant physical characters were detected; colour and size were found to be the key parameters for identifying SCF quality. Based on this correlation, a decision tree model was ultimately established and converted to a quality evaluation card. Over 80% consistency in a novice test demonstrated the technical advantages and application characteristics of the model. Further correlation analysis revealed that EQA quality grades of SCF were positively correlated to the content of polysaccharides and polyphenols, while negatively correlated to the content of lignans. Biological activities were also approving it. In summary, our study proves that subjective EQA is consistency, repeatability and could be inherited.