Abstract
With the ongoing growth in the field of neuro-inspired computing, newly arriving computational architectures demand extensive validation and testing against existing benchmarks to establish their competence and value. In our work, we break down the validation step into two parts-(1) establishing a methodological and numerical groundwork to establish a comparison between neuromorphic and conventional platforms and, (2) performing a sensitivity analysis on the obtained model regime to assess its robustness. We study the neuronal dynamics based on the Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) model, which is built upon data from the mouse visual cortex spanning a set of anatomical and physiological constraints. Intel Corp.'s first neuromorphic chip "Loihi" serves as our neuromorphic platform and results on it are validated against the classical simulations. After setting up a model that allows a seamless mapping between the Loihi and the classical simulations, we find that Loihi replicates classical simulations very efficiently with high precision. This model is then subjected to the second phase of validation, through sensitivity analysis, by assessing the impact on the cost function as values of the significant model parameters are varied. The work is done in two steps-(1) assessing the impact while changing one parameter at a time, (2) assessing the impact while changing two parameters at a time. We observe that the model is quite robust for majority of the parameters with slight change in the cost function. We also identify a subset of the model parameters changes which make the model more sensitive and thus, need to be defined more precisely.