Abstract
Various surgical strategies have been developed to alleviate elevated intraspinal pressure (ISP) following acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Surgical decompression of either the dural (durotomy) or the dural and pial (myelotomy) lining of the spinal cord has been proposed. However, a direct comparison of these two strategies is lacking. Here, we compare the histological and functional effects of durotomy alone and durotomy plus myelotomy in a rodent model of acute thoracic tSCI. Our results indicate that tSCI causes local tissue edema and significantly elevates ISP (7.4 ± 0.3 mmHg) compared with physiological ISP (1.7 ± 0.4 mmHg; p < 0.001). Both durotomy alone and durotomy plus myelotomy effectively mitigate elevated local ISP (p < 0.001). Histological examination at 10 weeks after tSCI revealed that durotomy plus myelotomy promoted spinal tissue sparing by 13.7% compared with durotomy alone, and by 25.9% compared with tSCI-only (p < 0.0001). Both types of decompression surgeries elicited a significant beneficial impact on gray matter sparing (p < 0.01). Impressively, durotomy plus myelotomy surgery increased preservation of motor neurons by 174.3% compared with tSCI-only (p < 0.05). Durotomy plus myelotomy surgery also significantly promoted recovery of hindlimb locomotor function in an open-field test (p < 0.001). Interestingly, only durotomy alone resulted in favorable recovery of bladder and Ladder Walk performance. Combined, our data suggest that durotomy plus myelotomy following acute tSCI facilitates tissue sparing and recovery of locomotor function. In the future, biomarkers identifying spinal cord injuries that can benefit from either durotomy alone or durotomy plus myelotomy need to be developed.