Abstract
Fat content is the main criterion for evaluating albacore quality. However, no reports exist on the accuracy of the tail-cutting method, a method used to assess the fat content of albacore. Here, we evaluated this method by comparing it with chemical analysis and ultrasound inspection. We measured the actual fat content in albacore using chemical analysis and compared the results with those obtained using the tail-cutting method. Significant discrepancies (99% CI, t-test) were observed in fat content among the tail-cutting samples. Using chemical analysis as the ground truth, the accuracy of tail-cutting from two different companies was 70.0% for company A and 51.9% for company B. An ultrasound inspection revealed that a higher fat content reduced the amplitude of ultrasound signals with statistical significance (99% CI, t-test). Finally, machine learning algorithms were used to enforce the ultrasound inspection. The best combination of ultrasound inspection and a machine learning algorithm achieved an 84.2% accuracy for selecting fat-rich albacore, which is better than tail-cutting (73.6%). Our findings suggested that ultrasound inspection could be a valuable and non-destructive method for estimating the fat content of albacore, achieving better accuracy than the traditional tail-cutting method.