Abstract
Novel theranostic approaches using radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have emerged for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The physical properties and commercial availability of (177)Lu make it one of the most used radionuclides for radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). In this literature review, we aimed at comparing the dosimetry of the most used [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT compounds. Methods: This was a systematic review and metaanalysis of [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA RPT (617, I&T, and J591) dosimetry in patients with prostate cancer. Absorbed doses in Gy/GBq for each organ at risk (kidney, parotid and submandibular glands, bone marrow, liver, and lacrimal glands) and for tumor lesions (bone and nonbone lesions) were extracted from included articles. These were used to estimate the pooled average absorbed dose of each agent in Gy/GBq and in Gy/cycle, normalized to the injected activity (per cycle) used in the VISION (7.4 GBq), SPLASH (6.8 GBq), and PROSTACT trials (5.8 GBq). Results: Twenty-nine published articles comprising 535 patients were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled doses (weighted average across studies) of [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T were 4.04 Gy/GBq (17 studies, 297 patients) and 4.70 Gy/GBq (10 studies, 153 patients) for the kidney (P = 0.10), 5.85 Gy/GBq (14 studies, 216 patients) and 2.62 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 86 patients) for the parotids (P < 0.01), 5.15 Gy/GBq (5 studies, 81 patients) and 4.35 Gy/GBq (1 study, 18 patients) for the submandibular glands (P = 0.56), 11.03 Gy/GBq (6 studies, 121 patients) and 19.23 Gy/GBq (3 studies, 53 patients) for the lacrimal glands (P = 0.20), 0.24 Gy/GBq (12 studies, 183 patients) and 0.19 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 68 patients) for the bone marrow (P = 0.31), and 1.11 Gy/GBq (9 studies, 154 patients) and 0.56 Gy/GBq (4 studies, 56 patients) for the liver (P = 0.05), respectively. Average tumor doses tended to be higher for [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 than for [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in soft tissue tumor lesions (4.19 vs. 2.94 Gy/GBq; P = 0.26). Dosimetry data of [(177)Lu]Lu-J591 were limited to one published study of 35 patients with reported absorbed doses of 1.41, 0.32, and 2.10 Gy/GBq to the kidney, bone marrow, and liver, respectively. Conclusion: In this metaanalysis, there was no significant difference in absorbed dose between [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. There was a possible trend toward a higher kidney dose with [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T and a higher tumor lesion dose with [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. It remains unknown whether this finding has any clinical impact. The dosimetry methodologies were strikingly heterogeneous among studies, emphasizing the need for standardization.