Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of different relative myocardial blood flow (MBF) ratios in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Between October 2020 and March 2024, patients with suspected or known obstructive CAD who underwent CTP + coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography/fractional flow reserve were retrospectively selected. Patients and vessels were categorized into ischemia and non-ischemia groups. The diagnostic efficacies of the three relative MBF ratios were compared in patients with obstructive CAD. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients (144 vessels). Notably, 34 of the 48 patients (70.83%) and 49 of the 144 vessels (34.03%) were considered to have myocardial ischemia. The area under the curve of Ratio-hi (0.944, 95% confidence interval: 0.893-0.976) was higher than those of Ratio-av, Ratio-Q3, and MBF-lowest; However, no statistical differences were found (P>0.005). The cutoff value for detecting Ratio-hi was 0.667, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 91.8%, 83.2%, 75%, 95.24%, and 86.81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Relative MBF ratios, especially Ratio-hi, demonstrated excellent performance and exhibited greater robustness in diagnosing myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive CAD.