Conclusion
Autologous platelet transfusion and TPO receptor agonists are effective clinical methods for treating chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. The combined use of both treatments yields better therapeutic results.
Methods
Clinical data from 120 patients with malignant tumors who developed thrombocytopenia following chemotherapy at our hospital were retrospectively collected and randomly divided into three groups: A, B, and C, with 40 patients in each group. Group A was treated with a TPO receptor agonist (avatrombopag), group B received autologous platelet transfusion, and group C received a combination of both treatments. The clinical efficacy of the three groups was compared, including platelet levels at different time points during treatment, platelet recovery time (time to reach < 50 × 109/L, ≥ 75-100 × 109/L, and ≥ 100 × 109/L), changes in serum cytokine levels (PF4, TPO, vWF) before and after treatment, and fluctuations in coagulation function indicators (APTT, PT, FIB) before and after treatment to analyze the effectiveness of each treatment regimen.
Objective
To observe the clinical efficacy of TPO receptor agonists and platelet transfusion in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in malignant tumors.
Results
About clinical efficacy, the effectiveness in group A was comparable to that in group B (P > 0.05), while the effective rate in group C was significantly higher than that in groups A and B (P < 0.05). Regarding platelet counts, repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant differences in the time effect, group effect, and interaction effect for platelet counts (PLT) among the three groups (P < 0.05). Concerning platelet recovery time, the time to reach PLT < 50 × 109/L, the time to recover to 75-100 × 109/L, and the time to recover to ≥ 100 × 109/L were similar in groups A and B (P > 0.05). However, the time for these parameters in group C was significantly shorter than in groups A and B (P < 0.05). In terms of changes in platelet parameters, post-treatment levels of PF4, TPO, and vWF in all three groups were significantly higher than pre-treatment levels. The PF4, TPO, and vWF levels in groups A and B were similar (P > 0.05), whereas group C had significantly higher levels compared to groups A and B (P < 0.05). Regarding coagulation indices, post-treatment levels of APTT and PT decreased, while FIB levels increased in all three groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in APTT and FIB levels between groups A and B (P > 0.05). However, group C had significantly lower APTT and higher FIB levels compared to groups A and B (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in PT levels among the three groups post-treatment (P > 0.05).