Area socioeconomic inequality and suicide mortality: contrasting common measures using National Violent Death Reporting System and linked administrative data

区域社会经济不平等与自杀死亡率:利用国家暴力死亡报告系统和关联的行政数据对比常用指标

阅读:1

Abstract

Area economic inequality may underlie social disparities in suicide mortality (SM). Differences in measuring inequality contribute to variability across empirical evidence. We contrasted common income measures-absolute poverty, Gini inequality index, Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE)-and examined their associations with age- and sex-standardized SM across 1381 US counties. We used the 2006-2019 National Violent Death Reporting System linked to 2006-2010 administrative data on socioeconomic factors and a Bayesian spatial multilevel approach. Compared to affluent areas, poorer areas had the highest relative risk (RR) of SM (ICE RR, 1.24; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.17-1.31; absolute poverty RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.41). Gini inequality was not linearly associated with SM. Cross-classifying Gini × ICE showed that the highest-risk areas had concentrated poverty (ICE) but varying Gini inequality. These high-risk, poverty-segregated areas were more often medically underserved, had lower population density, and high unemployment. African American or Indigenous suicide decedents frequently resided in high inequality areas, while older, White decedents with military backgrounds more often resided in lower Gini areas. The choice of inequality measure can lead to varied conclusions about social disparities in SM. A comparative approach offers more nuanced understanding of underlying socioeconomic marginalization.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。