Abstract
The what, where, and when components of episodic memory can be differentiated based on their distinctive domain-specific underlying neural correlates. However, recent studies have proposed that a common neural mechanism of conceptual mapping may be involved in the coding of cognitive distance across all domains. In this study, we provide evidence that both domain-specific and domain-general processes occur simultaneously during memory retrieval by identifying distinctive and common neural representations for mapping what (i.e., semantic distance), where (i.e., spatial distance), and when (i.e., temporal distance) using scalp EEG from 47 healthy participants (age 21-30, 26 male and 21 female). First, we found that all three components commonly showed a positive correlation between cognitive distance and slow theta power (2.5-5 Hz) in parietal channels. Meanwhile, fast theta power (5-8.5 Hz) specifically represented spatial and temporal distance in occipital and parietal channels, respectively. Additionally, we identified a unique correlate of temporal distance coding in frontal/parietal slow theta power during the early phase of retrieval. All of the above neural markers of cognitive mapping, both domain-general and specific, were associated with individual differences in what, where, and when memory accuracy.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The Cognitive Map Theory was originally founded to explain how we remember and organize the immense amount of spatial information that we face when we navigate. However, memory research has recently trended in the direction of emphasizing the generalizability of cognitive mapping mechanisms to information in any domain, represented as distances in an abstract conceptual space. In a single study, we show that both common and unique neural coding of semantic distance (i.e., what), spatial distance (i.e., where), and temporal distance (i.e., when) simultaneously support episodic memory retrieval. Our results suggest that our ability to accurately distinguish between memories is achieved through an integration of domain-specific and domain-general neurocognitive mechanisms that work in parallel.