Abstract
In the year 2019, a highly virulent coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged, precipitating the outbreak of the illness known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The commonly employed reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) methodology serves to estimate the viral load in each patient's sample by employing a standard curve. However, it is imperative to recognize that this technique exhibits limitations with respect to clinical diagnosis and therapeutic applications, since an advancement of the conventional polymerase chain reaction methods, digital polymerase chain reaction (digital PCR or DDPCR), enables the direct quantification and clonal amplification of nucleic acid strands. The primary divergence between dPCR and traditional PCR resides in their approaches to measuring nucleic acid quantities. In this study, we investigated the viral loads of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within 461 participants. By employing both RT-qPCR and DDPCR techniques, we established a comparison between the quantification methodologies of the two approaches. Our findings illustrate that the quantification through DDPCR affords a superior means of monitoring viral load within lower respiratory tract samples, thus enhancing the assessment of disease progression, particularly in scenarios characterized by low viral loads.