Abstract
Profile hidden Markov models (pHMMs) are able to achieve high sensitivity in remote homology search, making them popular choices for detecting novel or highly diverged viruses in metagenomic data. However, many existing pHMM databases have different design focuses, making it difficult for users to decide the proper one to use. In this review, we provide a thorough evaluation and comparison for multiple commonly used profile HMM databases for viral sequence discovery in metagenomic data. We characterized the databases by comparing their sizes, their taxonomic coverage, and the properties of their models using quantitative metrics. Subsequently, we assessed their performance in virus identification across multiple application scenarios, utilizing both simulated and real metagenomic data. We aim to offer researchers a thorough and critical assessment of the strengths and limitations of different databases. Furthermore, based on the experimental results obtained from the simulated and real metagenomic data, we provided practical suggestions for users to optimize their use of pHMM databases, thus enhancing the quality and reliability of their findings in the field of viral metagenomics.