Comparison of Intra-articular Haematoma Block and Procedural Sedation for the Manipulation of Closed Ankle Fracture Dislocations: A Cross-Sectional Study

关节内血肿阻滞与术中镇静治疗闭合性踝关节骨折脱位的比较:一项横断面研究

阅读:2

Abstract

Background Ankle fracture dislocations are commonly reduced in the emergency setting under procedural sedation (PS), which requires trained clinicians and monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the patient-reported efficacy of intra-articular haematoma block (IAHB) as an analgesic alternative to PS for the closed reduction of ankle fracture dislocations. Methods Data from patients with displaced ankle fractures requiring manipulation between October 2020 and April 2021 were analysed. Patients who received IAHB were compared to those who received PS. IAHB involved the injection of 10 mL of 1% lignocaine into the joint space. Results Twenty-eight patients received PS, and 25 received IAHB. There were no statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before, during, or after treatment (p > 0.05). First-attempt reductions were successful in 76% of IAHB patients compared to 82.1% of PS patients. IAHB was associated with lower medication costs and a shorter time to manipulation. Conclusion IAHB is a cost-effective and safe alternative to PS for managing ankle fracture dislocations.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。