Safety and Efficacy of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗在老年人群中的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) membrane protein F has become one of the major target proteins for RSV vaccine development, previous studies have identified safety issues with RSV vaccines in older adults. The causes of these issues remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel RSV preF vaccine in preventing lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and RSV-associated acute respiratory illnesses (RSV-ARIs) in older adults. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from 5 databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials-published up to July 31, 2024. For categorical variables, we used the risk ratio; for continuous variables, we used the weighted mean difference or standardized mean difference. We extracted key study characteristics and assessed their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the impact of individual studies on pooled effects, and publication bias was examined with Egger and Begg tests. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 5 studies (101,825 older adults) showed a reduced LRTI incidence in the vaccinated group, with heterogeneity resolved after excluding 1 study. Analysis of 4 studies (99,931 participants) confirmed a lower RSV-ARI incidence with no heterogeneity. Safety analysis (14 studies, 76,695 participants) showed higher adverse events (AEs) in the vaccinated group, mainly injection-site reactions and vaccine-related AEs, but no significant difference in serious AEs. Subgroup analyses identified potential sources of AE heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the efficacy but suggested variability in the injection-site reactions. . CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the incidence of LRTI and RSV-ARI between the vaccine and placebo groups in older adults. However, no significant differences were observed in overall AEs or serious AEs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。