Conclusions
CTSK+ PSCs may be endogenous stem cells for orbital bone repair. They are mobilized after orbital fracture and have unique features suitable for intramembranous osteogenesis, completely different from BMSCs.
Methods
Periosteum samples obtained by clinical orbital bone repair surgery were analyzed, after which immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical staining were used to detect the content of bone marrow-derived cells and CTSK+ PSCs in periosteum as well as the mobilization of PSCs. CTSK+ PSCs were characterized by flow cytometry. Transcriptome sequencing was used to compare the transcriptomic characteristics of CTSK+ PSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to explore the role of cathepsin K positive (CTSK+) periosteal stem cells (PSCs) in orbital bone repair and to clarify the source of endogenous stem cells for orbital bone self-repair.
Results
The orbital periosteum contained CTSK+CD200+ cell lineage, including CD200+CD105- PSCs and CD200+CD105+ progenitor cells. CTSK and osteocalcin (OCN) colocalized in the inner layer of the orbital periosteum, suggesting the osteogenic differentiation potential of CTSK+ PSCs. CTSK expression was much higher in periosteum after mobilization. Immunofluorescence showed low amounts of scattered CD31+ and CD45+ cells in the orbital periosteum. The stem cell characteristics of CTSK+ PSCs were verified by multidirectional differentiation. Flow cytometry found CD200+CD105- CTSK+ PSCs and CD200variantCD105+ progenitor cells. Transcriptome sequencing of CTSK+ PSCs and BMSCs found 3613 differential genes with significant differences. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed the differences between the two types of stem cells, revealing that PSCs were more suitable for intramembranous osteogenesis. Conclusions: CTSK+ PSCs may be endogenous stem cells for orbital bone repair. They are mobilized after orbital fracture and have unique features suitable for intramembranous osteogenesis, completely different from BMSCs.