Mechanisms of different response to ionizing irradiation in isogenic head and neck cancer cell lines

Treatment options for recurrent head and neck tumours in the previously irradiated area are limited, including re-irradiation due to radioresistance of the recurrent tumour and previous dose received by surrounding normal tissues. As an in vitro model to study radioresistance mechanisms, isogenic cells with different radiosensitivity can be used. However, they are not readily available. Therefore, our

We concluded that the emergence of the radioresistance in the established radioresistant isogenic cells can be at least partially attributed to the enhanced DNA double-strand break repair, altered expression of DNA damage signalling and repair genes. On the other hand, in radiosensitive isogenic cells the reduced ability to repair a high number of induced DNA double-strand breaks and no transcriptional response in DNA damage signalling genes indicate on a lack of adaptive response to irradiation. Altogether, our results confirmed that these isogenic cells with different radiosensitivity are an appropriate model to study the mechanisms of radioresistance.

Radioresistant cells were derived from parental FaDu cells by repeated exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiosensitivity of the established isogenic radioresistant FaDu-RR cells was evaluated by clonogenic assay and compared to isogenic parental FaDu and radiosensitive 2A3 cells. Additional phenotypic characterization of these isogenic cells with different radiosensitivity included evaluation of chemosensitivity, cell proliferation, cell cycle, radiation-induced apoptosis, resolution of DNA double-strand breaks, and DNA damage and repair signalling gene expression before and after irradiation.

In the newly established radioresistant cells in response to 5 Gy irradiation, we observed no alteration in cell cycle regulation, but delayed induction and enhanced resolution of DNA double-strand breaks, lower induction of apoptosis, and pronounced over-expression of DNA damage signalling genes in comparison to parental cells. On the other hand, radiosensitive 2A3 cells were arrested in G2/M-phase in response to 5 Gy irradiation, had a prominent accumulation of and slower resolution of DNA double-strand breaks, and no change in DNA damage signalling genes expression. Conclusions: We concluded that the emergence of the radioresistance in the established radioresistant isogenic cells can be at least partially attributed to the enhanced DNA double-strand break repair, altered expression of DNA damage signalling and repair genes. On the other hand, in radiosensitive isogenic cells the reduced ability to repair a high number of induced DNA double-strand breaks and no transcriptional response in DNA damage signalling genes indicate on a lack of adaptive response to irradiation. Altogether, our results confirmed that these isogenic cells with different radiosensitivity are an appropriate model to study the mechanisms of radioresistance.