Abstract
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the ambient atmosphere is strongly associated with detrimental health effects. However, these particles from various sources and regions are unlikely equally toxic. While animal studies are impractical for high-throughput toxicity testing, appropriate in vitro models are urgently needed. Co-culture of A549 and THP-1 macrophages grown at air-liquid interface (ALI) or under submerged conditions was exposed to same concentrations of ambient PM2.5 to provide accurate comparisons between culture methods. Following 24-h incubation with PM2.5 collected in Harbin in China, biological endpoints being investigated include cytotoxicity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and pro-inflammatory mediators. The co-culture grown under submerged condition demonstrated a significant increase in ROS levels and all tested pro-inflammatory indicators [interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α] in mRNA expression and released protein levels. Similar but a declining response trend was observed using the same PM2.5 incubation after grown at ALI. We further observed a significant increase of PM2.5-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and activation of NF-κB p65 in a dose-dependent trend for co-cultures grown under submerged condition. These results provide important implications that culture conditions (ALI versus submerged) can induce different extents of biological responses to ambient PM2.5; the co-culture grown at ALI is less likely to produce false-positive results than submerged culture. Hence, culture conditions should be discussed when comparing in vitro methods used for high-throughput PM2.5 toxicity assessment in future.