Abstract
This study investigated the differences in key volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and flavor characteristics between essential oils (CEOs) from cinnamon bark and leaf. The volatile compounds of essential oils extracted from Cinnamomum cassia (Xijiang) bark (CEOP) and leaf (CEOY) by hydrodistillation were identified using GC-MS. The results showed that the extraction rates of CEOP and CEOY were 1.56% ± 0.02 and 0.83% ± 0.01 (n = 3), respectively. CEOP and CEOY consisted of 45 and 50 compounds, respectively. Odor activity value (OAV) analysis indicated that cinnamaldehyde (OAV = 935), α-caryophyllene (OAV = 77), and borneol (OAV = 4) played key roles in shaping the aroma of CEOP. Meanwhile, cinnamaldehyde (OAV = 849), nerolidol (OAV = 107), and α-caryophyllene (OAV = 58) were the major contributors to the flavor of CEOY. Electronic nose (E-nose) analysis revealed that sensors W5S and W1W were important for detecting aromatic compounds. Sensory evaluation showed that CEOs differed significantly in spicy, floral, and grassy aromas. These differences may be related to the concentrations of compounds such as cinnamaldehyde, α-caryophyllene, and nerolidol, as well as their interactions with olfactory receptors such as OR2W1 and OR1D2. Cinnamaldehyde activates TRPA1 and TRPV1 to elicit the perception of spiciness. Thus, CEOP may be suitable for baked goods, and CEOY may be suitable for ice cream and beverages. In conclusion, this study provides a theoretical foundation for the precise application of CEOs as condiments in food.
Keywords:
GC-MS; cinnamon essential oil; electronic nose; flavor profile; molecular dynamics simulation; olfactory receptors.