Abstract
Polygenic risk score (PRS) models effectively predict breast cancer (BC) risk in European-ancestry women but have limited accuracy for African-ancestry women, particularly for aggressive subtypes. We developed PRS models for overall BC, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, ER-negative and triple-negative BC (TNBC) in African-ancestry women using data from the African Ancestry Breast Cancer Genetics consortium (17,391 cases and 18,800 controls). We applied several PRS methods and integrated information across ancestries and BC subtypes. The best models for overall, ER-positive, ER-negative and TNBC showed an area under the receiving operating curve of 0.612, 0.621, 0.611 and 0.639, respectively, and maintained predictive accuracy in external validation studies with area under the receiving operating curves of 0.612, 0.640, 0.605 and 0.652. We further introduce a parsimonious 162-variant PRS for TNBC with comparable accuracy (0.626). These findings demonstrate markedly improved PRS accuracy for BC risk prediction in African-ancestry women. Using these PRS models for screening will help promote more equitable cancer prevention efforts.