Procedural justice, managerial leadership and gender-based harassment in the workplace: longitudinal cross-lagged associations in a Swedish cohort

程序公正、管理领导力与职场性别骚扰:瑞典队列研究中的纵向交叉滞后关联

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gender-based harassment (GBH) is a persistent workplace problem with substantial consequences for employees and organizations. Although organizational conditions are assumed to shape harassment risk, longitudinal evidence on modifiable organizational antecedents remains limited. Building on organizational justice theory and the perpetrator-predation paradigm, this study examines whether procedural justice and supportive managerial leadership prospectively predict GBH. METHODS: Using data from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH) from 2018 and 2020 (n ≈ 5000), we estimated cross-lagged associations between self-reported procedural justice, managerial leadership, and experienced and witnessed GBH within a structural equation modelling framework. RESULTS: Experienced GBH was reported by 3%-4% and witnessed GBH by 6%-9% of the working sample. Higher procedural justice in 2018 was associated with a very small decreased risk of experienced (β = -0.001, p = 0.018) and a small decreased risk of witnessed (β = -0.052, p < 0.001) GBH in 2020. Higher managerial leadership scores were associated with a small decreased risk of experienced GBH (β = -0.036, p = 0.017). No reverse associations were observed. CONCLUSION: The findings provide longitudinal evidence that organizational justice and leadership, although relatively weak, shape harassment risk environments over time. By demonstrating prospective associations while accounting for reverse and stability effects, the study advances understanding of organizational antecedents of GBH beyond predominantly cross-sectional research.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。