Abstract
Delivery of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can achieve gene transfer to cells throughout the brain and spinal cord, potentially making many neurological diseases tractable gene therapy targets. Identifying the optimal route of CSF access for intrathecal AAV delivery will be a critical step in translating this approach to clinical practice. We previously demonstrated that vector injection into the cisterna magna is a safe and effective method for intrathecal AAV delivery in nonhuman primates; however, this procedure is not commonly used in clinical practice. More routine methods of administration into the CSF are now being explored, including intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection and injection through a lumbar puncture. In this study, we compared ICV and intracisternal (IC) AAV administration in dogs. We also evaluated vector administration via lumbar puncture in nonhuman primates, with some animals placed in the Trendelenburg position after injection, a maneuver that has been suggested to improve cranial distribution of vector. In the dog study, ICV and IC vector administration resulted in similarly efficient transduction throughout the brain and spinal cord. However, animals in the ICV cohort developed encephalitis associated with a T-cell response to the transgene product, a phenomenon that was not observed in the IC cohort. In the nonhuman primate study, transduction efficiency was not improved by placing animals in the Trendelenburg position after injection. These findings illustrate important limitations of commonly used methods for CSF access in the context of AAV delivery, and will be important for informing the selection of a route of administration for first-in-human studies.