Abstract
The effectiveness of CO(2)-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is strongly dependent on the CO(2)-oil minimum miscible pressure (MMP) value, which can be estimated using various methods. In this study, interfacial tension (IFT) and slim-tube tests were used to estimate the MMP value. Experimental results indicated that the IFT test had a higher MMP value than the slim-tube test. Particularly, the outcomes of IFT and the slim-tube tests differed slightly, i.e., 0.7% and 4.3% at 60 and 66 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the current work also compares MMP data gathered using visual observation and equation of state (EOS) simulation. The MMP estimated by EOS is higher but close to the IFT and slim-tube recovery factor method, where all results are within the 1650-1700 psi and 1700-1800 psi visual observation ranges at 60 and 66 °C, respectively. However, MMP deviations concerning the slim-tube test and EOS were consistent at different temperatures. This study offers an alternative to estimate and evaluate CO(2)-oil MMP for EOR applications accurately and efficiently.