Comparison of two amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-resistant profiles employing two types of assay disks: A pilot study in 50 isolates from a tertiary care hospital in India

采用两种检测纸片对两种阿莫西林/克拉维酸耐药菌株进行检测的比较:一项在印度一家三级医院50株分离株中进行的初步研究

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During a period from January to March 2005, there was a sudden 3.85-fold increase in isolates with in vitro resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid at Sant Parmanand Hospital, a private tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India, without an increase in treatment failures. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study was designed to assess whether 2 different brands (one exclusively used during the last quarter of 2004, one exclusively used during the first quarter of 2005) of antibiotic disks used at the hospital were related to the reported change in resistance pattern. METHODS: During April 2005, 50 consecutive hospital isolates, 45 gram negative and 5 gram positive, were tested in parallel, employing 2 brands of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid disks: HiMedia disks (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) and BBL(TM) Sensi-Disc(TM) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Maryland). RESULTS: Of 50 consecutive hospital isolates tested with the HiMedia disks, 40 were resistant and 10 were susceptible. Of those tested with the BBL disks, 10 were resistant and 40 were susceptible. The susceptibility profiles observed were significantly different (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, significantly different susceptibility results were found when 2 different brands of antibiotic disks were used to test the amoxicillin/clavulanic susceptibility of 50 consecutive isolates in this private hospital in India.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。