1150. Evaluating the Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Microbiology and Incidence of Ventriculitis in Patients with External Ventricular Drains

1150. 评估抗生素预防对脑室外引流患者脑室炎微生物学和发病率的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: External ventricular drains (EVDs) are frequently used in acute brain injuries for continuous intracranial pressure monitoring and cerebrospinal (CSF) fluid diversion. EVDs are associated with a 0–22% risk of ventriculitis. The evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for ventriculitis prevention is not robust. This study aimed to delineate the incidence of EVD-related ventriculitis and causative organisms in patients receiving AP. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2013 to 2018 at Yale New Haven Hospital was performed. Patients were included if ≥18 years of age, admitted to the neurosciences intensive care unit (ICU), and had AP with cefazolin, vancomycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, or clindamycin. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of meningitis or ventriculitis prior to EVD placement, on multiple agents for AP, on antibiotics for indications other than AP, CSF leak, or skull fracture. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ventriculitis per 1,000 EVD-days. Secondary endpoints were causative organisms of ventriculitis, EVD duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-nine patients were reviewed and 249 patients were included. Baseline demographics are noted in Table 1. Cefazolin was the most common agent for AP (98%). There were 7 cases of ventriculitis with an incidence rate of 2.8% (4 infections per 1000 EVD-days). All of the causative organisms were resistant to the prophylactic agents administered (Table 2). Patients with ventriculitis had a significantly longer duration of EVD placement (10 ± 3 vs. 7 ± 6 days, P = 0.03), hospital LOS (30 ± 19 days vs. 15 ± 12, P = 0.04), ICU LOS (22 ± 14 vs. 10 ± 7, P = 0.03). Two patients with ventriculitis (28%) died within 30 days of admission compared with 46 patients without ventriculitis (19%, P = 0.53) (Table 3). CONCLUSION: The rate of ventriculitis in our study was similar to previous studies that did not utilize AP. All of the causative organisms were resistant to the prophylactic agent. Patients who had ventriculitis had a longer duration of EVD placement, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS; however, 30-day mortality was not impacted. Based on our findings, the use of AP to prevent EVD-related ventriculitis should be reconsidered. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。