A culturally-safe primary care intervention for migrant/refugee women suffering domestic violence and abuse: HARMONY-a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

一项针对遭受家庭暴力和虐待的移民/难民妇女的文化安全型初级保健干预措施:HARMONY——一项实用性整群随机对照试验

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immigrant women can experience high rates of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and migration trauma. Family or general practitioners (GPs) have limited DVA training or support to manage culturally competent DVA practice and associated trauma. The HARMONY study aimed to increase culturally competent DVA identification and referral among all, but especially migrant/refugee women from South-Asia, attending Australian GP clinics. METHODS: Twenty-four GP clinics were recruited among two South-Asian communities in Northwest and Southeast Melbourne for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Eligible clinics (i) employed ≥ 1 South-Asian GPs, (ii) used 1 of 2 electronic software programs, and (iii) agreed to anonymised, aggregated data extraction from computerised records. The intervention comprised (a) GP DVA educator and bilingual South-Asian DVA advocate co-delivering 4 h of online accredited culturally competent DVA training, and (b) 12 months follow-up support by the DVA advocate to intervention clinics. Comparison clinics offered routine care and were offered DVA training following the intervention's completion. Investigators and statistician were blinded to allocation, but clinics and frontline staff were not. Aggregated, anonymised routine data were extracted for primary outcomes of DVA identification and referral at 12 and 15 months. Per-protocol adjusted, intention-to-treat analysis using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Five of 24 GP recruited clinics withdrew before the trial began due to COVID-19. At baseline, GPs recorded DVA in 0.6% of 45,438 women, (but 0.4% among South-Asian women) and none recorded DVA referrals. Identification trended up in both arms, but we found no evidence of difference in DVA identification at 12 months in Intervention (0.98%, 252/25816) vs Comparison (0.88%, 199/22546), IRR 1.17 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.28) or at 15 months Intervention 1.01% (287/26218) vs Comparison 0.96% (217/22643), IRR 1.17 (95% CI 0.60-2.67). Referrals were rare (Int 14/252 vs Comp 6/199). 6/14 Intervention referrals were South-Asian women. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: While we found no evidence of HARMONY effectiveness, COVID-19 may have undermined its implementation. The model is promising for future research and refinement for clinics motivated to improve DVA management with diaspora minority ethnic communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12618001845224p registered:13/11/2018.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。